Skip to content

Dog Bite Laws

Dog Bite Laws

Dog bite laws in the United States vary significantly from state to state, displaying a complex patchwork of regulations governing liability and negligence. These laws determine when a dog owner can be held legally responsible for injuries their pet inflicts on another person. Understanding these laws is crucial for both dog owners and victims, as it affects the outcome of personal injury claims arising from dog bites. Typically, state laws can be broadly categorized as either following a strict liability rule or a one-bite rule.

Under strict liability statutes, a dog owner may be held liable for any injury their dog causes, regardless of the animal’s past behavior or the owner’s knowledge of any potential aggression. This means that an owner cannot escape responsibility by claiming ignorance of the dog’s tendency to bite. This is different from the one-bite rule, which suggests that a dog owner is only considered negligent and thus liable for personal injury if they were aware that their dog had the propensity to cause harm or had bitten someone previously.

The legal implications for a dog bite can be extensive, potentially including medical expenses, lost wages, and compensation for pain and suffering. State statutes may also include specific provisions regarding the containment or restraint of dogs, as well as outlining penalties for owners who fail to adhere to these guidelines. Victims of dog bites may have the right to pursue compensation, but the success of such claims relies heavily on the state’s legal framework governing dog bite liability. Therefore, staying informed about relevant state laws is imperative for all parties involved.

General Dog Bite Liability and Negligence

Understanding the specifics of dog bite liability and negligence is critical in the event of a personal injury involving a dog bite. Various laws determine whether the dog owner is held liable for damages or injuries caused by their pet.

Concept of Negligence in Dog Bite Cases

Negligence in dog bite cases hinges on the owner’s failure to act with reasonable care to prevent their dog from biting someone. To prove negligence, the injured party must demonstrate that the dog owner knew or should have known that their dog had the propensity to cause harm and did not take sufficient measures to prevent the incident. This can include failing to leash a dog in a public space, not securing a yard, or ignoring local leash laws.

The Role of Dog Owner in Liability

The dog owner often plays a central role in liability for dog bites. Owners are responsible for their pets’ actions and may be held liable if they were negligent in controlling or supervising their dog. Factors affecting liability can include:

  • Proof of previous aggression or bites by the dog
  • Whether the dog was provoked
  • If the bite occurred while the victim was trespassing

Understanding Strict Liability Laws

Strict liability laws hold the dog owner responsible for dog bites, regardless of the owner’s negligence or the dog’s past behavior. Under these laws, the owner’s responsibility for personal injury caused by their dog is not contingent on prior knowledge of the dog’s aggression or on provocation. However, strict liability laws can vary widely by state, and in some jurisdictions, they may not apply if the bite occurred on the owner’s property or if the victim was trespassing or provoking the dog.

In understanding the legal landscape of dog bite cases, it is crucial to familiarize oneself with the Dog Bite Law By State (2024 Guide) that apply, as they can shift liability and influence the course of legal action. These laws are designed to address the delicate balance between the rights of the dog owner and the protection of the public from harm.

Specific State Dog Bite Statutes

Dog bite laws vary significantly from state to state, with major differences in how liability is determined and the definitions of a dog owner’s responsibility.

Variations in State Laws

Each state has developed its own statute addressing the issue of dog bites, resulting in a patchwork of legal frameworks across the country. California, for instance, has a statute that imposes strict liability on dog owners for bites, without the requirement of proving prior knowledge of the dog’s viciousness. In contrast, Florida mandates that dog owners are responsible for any damage done by their dogs to people or to other domestic animals, and also allows for owner’s negligence to reduce the liability proportionally.

Dog Bite Law by State

Below, you will find an infographic table with the statutes of state laws for dog bite law: 

StateState RuleStatute/Case Law
AlabamaOwner liable for all injuries caused without provocation if victim is lawfully on owner’s propertyAla. Code § 3-6-1
AlaskaNegligence rules apply to determine owner liabilitySinclair v. Okata
ArizonaOwner liable for all injuries caused without provocation if victim is lawfully on public or private propertyAriz. Rev. Statutes sections 11-1020, 11-1025, 11-1026
ArkansasNegligence rules apply to determine owner liability. Owner strictly liable if the owner was aware of dog’s dangerous propensitiesStrange v. Stovall
CaliforniaOwner liable for all injuries caused without provocation if victim is lawfully on owner’s propertyCal. Civ. Code § 3342
ColoradoOwner strictly liable for all serious bodily injuries. One-bite rule applies in other circumstances. Exceptions to owner liability for provocation, or if owner had signs such as “Beware of Dog”Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-124
ConnecticutOwner strictly liable for injuries except if the victim was trespassing, abusing the dog, or committing a tort Presumption against trespass for victims under age 7Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 22-357
DelawareOwner strictly liable for injuries except if the victim was trespassing, abusing the dog, or committing a tortDel. Code Ann. § 1711
District of ColumbiaOwner strictly liable for all injuries caused by at-large dogs Contributory negligence rules apply to prevent victims from recovering if they share responsibility for the bite.D.C. Code Ann. § 8-1808
FloridaOwner strictly liable for all injuries except in cases of trespass, if the victim was committing a tort, or if the owner had a “Bad Dog” sign visibly on displayFla. Stat. sections 767.01, 767.04
GeorgiaOwner liable for dogs not under control or for bites committed by a “dangerous animal”Ga. Code Ann. sections 51-2-7
HawaiiNegligent owners liable, with exceptions such as trespass or abuse of the dogHaw. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 663-9
IdahoOne bite rule appliesIdaho Code § 25-2805
IllinoisOwner strictly liable for injuries except if the victim was trespassing or the dog was provoked510 I.L.C.S. 5/16 § 16
IndianaStrict liability when the dog injures victims who were carrying out a federal or state duty (such as postal workers) One bite/negligence rules in other situationsInd. Code 15-20-1-3
IowaOwners liable for dogs trying to bite or attack persons, or worrying, maiming or killing domestic animalsIowa Code Ann. § 351.28
KansasNegligent owners liable, and one bite rule appliesMercer v. Fritts, Henkel v. Jordan
KentuckyStrict liabilityKy. Rev. Stat. § 258.235
LouisianaStrict liability if the owner could have prevented the bite (unless the dog was provoked)La. C.C. Art. § 2321
MaineStrict liability if the bite occurs off the owner’s property and the victim didn’t provoke the dogMe. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 3961
MarylandStrict liability for damages caused by dogs running at large, unless the victim was trespassing, trying to commit another crime, or provoked the dogCode of Maryland § 3-1901
MassachusettsStrict liability unless the victim was trespassing or provoking the dog Presumption against trespassing and provocation if the victim was under age 7Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. 140 § 155
MichiganStrict liability for unprovoked attacks if the victim was on public property or lawfully on private propertyMich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 287.351
MinnesotaStrict liability for unprovoked bites if the victim was peaceably in any location where they had a lawful right to beMinn. Stat. Ann. § 347.22
MississippiOne bite rulePoy v. Grayson
MissouriStrict liability for unprovoked attacks if the victim was on public property or lawfully on private propertyMo. Rev. Stat. § 273.036
MontanaStrict liability for damages caused by a dog in an incorporated town or cityMont. Code Ann. § 27-1-715
NebraskaStrict liability unless the bite occurs through the dog’s playfulness or the victim was trespassingNeb. Rev. Stat. § 54-601
NevadaNegligence rules apply, owners can face felony charges under Section 202.500 if a vicious dog bitesNev. Stat. Ann. § 202.500
New HampshireStrict liability for all situations where the dog causes injury, including bites and mischievous actsN.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 466:19
New JerseyStrict liability if the victim was on public property or lawfully on private propertyN.J. Stat. Ann. § 4:19-16
New MexicoOwners liable for negligence or if they had prior knowledge of the dog’s propensity towards violenceSmith v. Village of Ruidoso
New YorkOwner liable for injuries caused by “dangerous dog”N.Y. Agriculture & Markets Law, § 123(10)
North CarolinaStrict liability for at-large dogs or for dangerous dogs. Negligence determines owner liability in other situationsN.C. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 67-12, 67-4.4, 67-4.1
North DakotaDog owner liable under negligence rulesSendelbach v. Grad
OhioStrict liability for injuries caused by a dog except if the victim was trespassing, committing another crime, or teased, torment, or abused the dogOhio Rev. Code. Ann. § 955.28
OklahomaStrict liability for bites that occur when the victim is lawfully on public or private property and did not provoke the dogOkla. Stat. Ann. § 4-42.1
OregonOwner liable if they know or should have known of the dog’s dangerous propensitiesWestberry v. Blackwell,
PennsylvaniaStrict liability for unprovoked severe injuries One bite rule in other circumstancesPa. Consol. Stat. § 502 A
Rhode IslandStrict liability unless the dog was confinedR.I. Gen. Laws § 4-13-16
South CarolinaStrict liability for bites that occur when the victim is lawfully on public or private propertyS.C. Code Ann. § 47-3-110
South DakotaOwner liable under negligence rules or if the owner knew of the dog’s dangerous propensitiesBlaha v. Stuard
TennesseeStrict liability except if the victim was a trespasserTenn. Code Ann. § 44-8-413
TexasOwner liable if the owner had knowledge of the dog’s dangerous propensities, violated leash laws, or was negligentV.T.C.A., Health & Safety Code § 822.005
UtahStrict liability except for peace officers, counties, cities, or towns who are not liable for injuries caused by law enforcement animalsUtah Code Ann. § 18-1-1
VermontOwner liable if the owner knew, or should have known, of the dog’s dangerous propensitiesHillier v. Noble
VirginiaOwners have common law duty to exercise ordinary care and can be held liable for negligence or if they knew the dog had a dangerous propensityButler v. Frieden
WashingtonStrict liability except for peace officers, counties, cities, or towns who are not liable for injuries caused by law enforcement animalsWash. Rev. Code § 16-08-040
West VirginiaStrict liability if the dog is running at largeW. Va. Code § 19-20-13
WisconsinOne bite rule for first bite Penalty between $50 and $500 if the dog injures a person, domestic animal, property, deer, game birds, or the nests or eggs of game birds Strict liability for double the damages for a second biteWis. Stat. § 174.02(1)(a) and Wis. Stat. § 174.02(1)(b)
WyomingOwner liable if the victim proves negligence or knowledge of the dog’s dangerous propensitiesBorns ex rel. Gannon v. Voss

One-Bite Rule vs. Strict Liability States

Some states adhere to the one-bite rule, which means a dog owner is only held liable for a dog bite if they had reason to believe the dog was dangerous. This typically stems from previous behavior like a past bite. On the other hand, strict liability states do not require proof of prior aggression or bites; the owner of the dog is liable for dog bite injuries regardless of the animal’s past behavior. California is an example of a strict liability state.

Rule TypeExamples of States
One-Bite RuleTexas, Virginia
Strict LiabilityCalifornia, New York

Interpreting ‘Running at Large’ Statutes

“Running at large” statutes pertain to dogs roaming free and unsupervised in public places or on another person’s property. State laws diverge in their interpretation of such statutes. California has specific leash laws that classify a dog “at large” when not on a leash and impose liability on the owner if a bite occurs under these circumstances. Conversely, Florida considers a dog “at large” if it is not confined in a particular manner prescribed by local ordinances, which can influence liability.

Legal Actions and Defenses

In addressing dog bite incidents, legal actions and defenses are paramount. The victim can seek compensation, while the dog owner can raise defenses to mitigate liability.

Hiring a Lawyer for Dog Bite Cases

Seeking legal representation is advisable for victims of dog bites. An experienced attorney can help navigate state laws and may significantly impact the compensation received. Lawyers understand dog bite statutes and case law, helping victims to build a strong claim.

Defenses Against Dog Bite Claims

Dog owners can assert several defenses in response to bite claims:

  • Provocation: Evidence showing the dog was provoked can absolve the owner of liability.
  • Trespassing: If the bite occurred while the victim was trespassing, the owner might not be held responsible.
  • Dangerous Dog Knowledge: Owners may claim they were unaware that their dog was dangerous if there is no history of aggression.

The effectiveness of these defenses often hinges on state-specific statutes and precedents.

Importance of Evidence in Dog Attacks

Solid evidence is critical in dog bite cases. Documentation includes medical reports, witness statements, and records of the dog’s behavior. Photos of injuries and the location of the attack can substantiate the victim’s account. Conversely, evidence of trespass or provocation can support the defenses of the dog owner.

Implications of Dog Attacks

Understanding the implications of dog attacks is critical for victims, dog owners, and the general public. This involves recognizing the potential for compensation, the gravest outcomes such as fatality, and the importance of preventative measures enforced by responsible ownership to mitigate such events.

Compensation for Dog Bite Victims

Victims of dog bites may seek compensation for a variety of damages. Economic damages include medical bills and lost wages, which are fairly straightforward. Pain and suffering, however, involves compensation for the physical and emotional distress caused by the attack. Each state has its own statutes governing the liability of dog owners and the available remedies to bite victims.

Type of DamagesDescription
Economic DamagesCosts directly related to the bite (medical bills, lost wages)
Non-Economic DamagesIncludes pain and suffering, emotional distress

When a Dog Bite Leads to Fatality

In the most tragic cases where a dog bite leads to fatality, the implications deepen considerably. The bereaved may be entitled to wrongful death claims, aiming to cover both economic losses (like funeral expenses) and non-economic impacts (such as loss of companionship). The dog owner’s responsibility in such situations is often scrutinized, and legal actions can be more severe.

Preventative Measures and Responsible Ownership

Responsible ownership is pivotal in preventing dog bites, encompassing proper training, socialization, and adherence to local leash laws. Owners are typically liable for their dogs’ actions, meaning failure to take preventative measures can lead to legal consequences. Consequently, public education campaigns stress the importance of understanding canine behavior to reduce the number of dog-related incidents.

Preventative MeasuresDescription
TrainingEnsuring the dog responds to commands to prevent aggressive reactions
SocializationExposing the dog to various situations to reduce fear and aggression
Leash LawsFollowing local regulations regarding restraint of dogs in public spaces

Client Testimonials

They WILL take care of you.

This was the easiest and best experience I've experienced with a law firm. They represented me aggressively and handled my case with finesse and diligence. I highly recommend anyone who is having any issues to reach out to Mike Agruss Law Firm. They WILL take care of you.


He went above and beyond

Mike called me on the weekend to answer a question I had emailed him on a Friday I wasn't expecting to hear from him until Monday. He went above and beyond anything I could have ever expected. Not only is he a excellent attorney he is also a kind, caring and a patient person. I was truly blessed by him, his paralegal, and this law firm.


Thank you everyone!

Yes this team is incredible. They were not only professional and intelligent and thorough, they demonstrated the highest level of care and compassion for what was otherwise a really demoralizing and confusing experience. My case was long and difficult and they kept me in the loop all along the way and brought it to excellent resolution. So grateful to their team especially Rachael who took my first flustered call on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving to partner Jim who carried the case across the line. Oh, and they got a great settlement! Thank you everyone!


I can’t say thank you enough!

I was injured and tried handling things on my own with insurance. My first call it was apparent they weren’t going to help me even though I wasn’t at fault. I was referred to Mike Agruss Law and the experience made what was a nightmare turn into an easy and peaceful experience. They handled everything for me and made sure my medical bills were paid, and I was compensated for loss of wages and more. I came to them in tears, shaken up, and scared. They comforted me and took care of me and my family. I can’t say thank you enough! Thank you, Rachael Mitchell, Jackie Laino, and Ryan Platt!!


Highly recommend

We had a wonderful experience with Mike Agruss Law! They were honest and took care of our issue quickly and efficiently. Highly recommend.


Thank you!

Mike and his team were compassionate, detailed, and displayed excellent professionalism. This is the 1st time I needed a lawyer for legal services. Mike and his team walked me through the process. Agruss law firm are real experts. They fought for me and were able to settle my case. I received more than expected. Thanks to Mike and his team. I felt value and appreciate by them. Thank you!


I highly recommend Mike Agruss and his staff.

The attorneys at Agruss are attentive, hard-working, and genuinely care for their clients and their best interests. I have seen them work tirelessly to ensure the best outcome for clients. I highly recommend Mike Agruss and his staff.


Communication was top notch

Mike Agruss Law was extremely easy to work with. They helped me on two different times. Communication was top notch. If ever in need I would use again and have recommended to several people.


I highly recommend him and his firm!

Mike Agruss is an extremely knowledgeable personal injury attorney who puts his client's best interests first. Whenever I reach out to him with questions, he always gets back to me right away, which is extremely refreshing when dealing with an attorney. I highly recommend him and his firm!


Mike Agruss Law was incredibly helpful

Mike Agruss Law was incredibly helpful and tenacious at fighting for me with my case. I am beyond satisfied with my results and cannot recommend them enough for all the hard work they put in. They really care about what they do and care about their clients and it can be seen in the work they do. All that is left to say was that my case was a win-win all around very happy with the results. Please consider them if you have any issues.



Dog Bite Laws Prioritizes Justice

Contact us via call, email, text, or chat to discuss your case.

Let Us Know About Your Dog Bite

Full Name