Available 24/7
Available 24/7
A serious dog attack in Minnesota can mean emergency surgery, permanent scarring, lost wages, and lasting trauma. Minnesota has one of the most victim-friendly dog bite laws in the country: under Minn. Stat. § 347.22, an owner is liable for the full amount of the injury when a dog attacks a person acting peaceably in a place they have a lawful right to be — no proof of negligence or prior viciousness required.
That protection is strong, but insurers still fight hard to raise defenses or minimize payouts. At Dog Bite Laws, we hold negligent owners and their insurers accountable so Minnesota victims recover the full compensation the law allows — medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering.
Economic damages are the direct, measurable financial losses caused by the attack. These include emergency room bills, hospitalization costs, surgery fees (including reconstructive or plastic surgery for scarring), follow-up medical appointments, prescribed medications, wound care, and physical therapy or rehabilitation. If injuries require ongoing treatment, future medical expenses are also recoverable.
Lost wages cover income you missed during recovery. If the injuries affect your ability to work long-term, for example, nerve damage to your hands, or PTSD that prevents you returning to your previous role, loss of future earning capacity can also be claimed. These figures are typically supported by employer records, tax returns, and expert testimony.
Non-economic damages cover the human cost of the attack. Pain and suffering accounts for the physical discomfort experienced during and after the injury. Emotional distress covers anxiety, depression, nightmares, and the lasting fear of dogs that many victims develop, particularly children. PTSD is common after dog attacks and has real, documentable medical value in a claim.
Permanent scarring or disfigurement carries significant weight, especially when it is visible on the face, neck, or hands. Loss of enjoyment covers activities the victim can no longer participate in due to physical or psychological limitations. Loss of consortium may be claimed by a spouse or family member when the attack meaningfully disrupts the victim’s relationships and family life.
If the victim is a minor, parents or legal guardians can file on their behalf for both economic and non-economic damages. Claims involving children often reach higher values due to the long-term duration of disfigurement and the psychological impact that can follow a child into adulthood.
With dog bite cases, punitive damages do not apply. They are reserved for situations where the dog owner’s conduct was especially reckless or malicious. For example, knowingly keeping a dog with a documented history of attacks without any precautions, or allowing an aggressive dog to roam free in a populated area after prior warnings. When punitive damages are available, they can significantly increase total recovery above compensatory amounts.
Several factors shape the final settlement value. The severity of the injury such as a deep facial wound requiring multiple surgeries, can settle for far more than a bite that heals cleanly. The visibility of scarring, the victim’s age, available insurance coverage, quality of medical documentation, and strength of the liability argument all play a role.
Our team has recovered over $1M in individual dog bite settlements. See real case results including a $505,000 settlement for a facial bite and a $295,000 recovery for a three-year-old victim. For a quick estimate of your own case value, use our dog bite settlement calculator.
The steps you take in the first 24 to 48 hours after a dog bite directly affect your ability to recover full compensation. Evidence disappears fast and early mistakes can be used against you.
Contact a Minnesota dog bite lawyer before accepting any settlement offer. Early offers typically undervalue long-term medical costs and non-economic damages. Once you accept, you generally cannot reopen the claim.
Minnesota gives dog bite victims six years from the date of the attack to file a personal injury lawsuit based on the statute (Minn. Stat. § 541.05), because a § 347.22 claim is a liability created by statute. For children injured by a dog, the deadline is generally extended, but you should never assume extra time applies to your case.
Six years is longer than most states allow, but it is not a reason to wait. Medical records must be gathered, insurance coverage identified, responsible parties confirmed, and witnesses located before memories fade and evidence disappears. Contacting an attorney early protects both your health and your claim.
Dog bite settlements are paid through the dog owner’s homeowners or renters insurance policy. Standard homeowners policies typically include personal liability coverage between $100,000 and $300,000, and that coverage applies to dog bite incidents even when the attack happens away from the insured property. If the bite occurred at a rental property, the landlord’s policy may also apply.
Insurance companies will work to minimize what they pay. They may claim the bite was provoked, challenge the severity of injuries, or dispute liability. Having a dog bite lawyer handle all communication with the insurer protects your claim from being undervalued before you fully understand the scope of your damages.
Minnesota’s dog bite statute, Minn. Stat. § 347.22, imposes strict liability on a dog’s owner when the dog, without provocation, attacks or injures a person who is acting peaceably in a place where they may lawfully be. The victim does not have to prove the owner was negligent or knew the dog had dangerous tendencies — the owner is liable for the full amount of the injury sustained.
The statute is broad. Minnesota courts treat it as an absolute strict-liability rule, and it is not limited to bites: it covers non-bite injuries too, such as lacerations from scratches or harm caused when a dog knocks a person off a bicycle. The law also defines ‘owner’ to include anyone harboring or keeping the dog, though the owner remains primarily liable.
Because § 347.22 is treated as an absolute strict-liability statute, an owner cannot escape liability by showing they used reasonable care or that the dog had always behaved well before. The dog’s past good behavior is irrelevant, and the owner’s knowledge is beside the point.
Minnesota courts have also held that ordinary comparative fault does not apply to reduce a § 347.22 recovery. Combined with the statute’s coverage of non-bite injuries, this makes Minnesota one of the strongest states in the country for dog attack victims — the main battlegrounds are provocation and whether the victim was acting peaceably in a lawful place.
For a full breakdown of the laws, liability rules, and reporting requirements, see our dedicated Minnesota dog bite laws guide.
Because § 347.22 already imposes strict liability, most Minnesota victims do not need an alternative theory — but one can still add value. A traditional negligence claim requires proving that the owner owed a duty to control the dog, breached that duty, and that the breach proximately caused the injuries.
A violation of a local leash law or animal-control ordinance can also support a claim of negligence per se, where the owner’s breaking of a safety law is treated as evidence of negligence itself. We investigate every available theory to maximize your recovery.
Minnesota’s statute defines ‘owner’ broadly to include any person harboring or keeping the dog, so responsibility often extends beyond the legal owner. A keeper or harborer who was caring for the dog, a landlord who knew a dangerous dog lived on the property and did nothing, or a parent of a minor owner may all share liability, though the owner is primarily liable.
Identifying every responsible party matters because it can open additional insurance coverage — often the difference between a policy that fully covers your injuries and one that falls short.
Provocation is the defense insurers raise most often, claiming the victim triggered the attack. In Minnesota, ordinary reactions — flinching, walking past, or protecting a child — are not provocation, and we push back hard on inflated versions of events.
Beyond provocation, an owner can argue the victim was not acting peaceably or was somewhere they had no lawful right to be. Notably, Minnesota courts hold that ordinary comparative fault is not a valid defense under § 347.22 — an owner cannot reduce your recovery just by claiming you were partly careless. Defeating an insurer’s attempt to force your case into one of the statute’s narrow exceptions is exactly where experienced representation pays off.
Dog attacks are a serious and rising cost nationwide: U.S. insurers paid about $1.86 billion across 28,450 dog-related injury claims, an average of roughly $65,450 per claim, and more than 5,200 postal workers were attacked by dogs in 2025. Minnesota sees this firsthand: Minneapolis ranked among the worst cities in the nation for postal-worker dog attacks, with 29 in 2025.
Because Minnesota’s statute covers non-bite injuries and imposes liability for the full amount of harm, claims here can reach beyond typical bite wounds to falls, knock-downs, and other trauma — often covered by the owner’s homeowners’ or renters’ insurance.
Minnesota also maintains a formal dangerous dog framework. Under Minn. Stat. § 347.50 and related sections, animal control can classify a dog as potentially dangerous or dangerous and impose registration, muzzling, and confinement requirements, and a prior classification can be powerful evidence in your civil claim.
Dog Bite Laws is led by Michael Agruss, Managing Partner and personal injury attorney with a track record of results in dog bite cases. He is supported by Michael Bertucci, Taylor Kosla Unterberg, and Zara Saiyed, a team that handles dog bite cases across Minnesota and multiple other states.
The firm has recovered millions of dollars for dog bite victims. These results reflect the firm’s approach: identify every liable party, document every dollar of damages, and push for a full settlement before resorting to trial.
The team is available 24/7 and takes every case on a contingency basis. There are no upfront legal fees and no costs unless we win.
Read more client testimonials or contact us directly for a free, confidential case review.
Minnesota’s statute of limitations for a dog bite claim under the statute is six years from the date of the attack under Minn. Stat. § 541.05, because it is a liability created by statute. Claims involving children may have more time, but missing the deadline generally ends your right to recover. See our full Minnesota dog bite laws guide for detail on how deadlines are calculated.
No. Minnesota is a strict-liability state. Under Minn. Stat. § 347.22, the owner is liable for the full amount of your injury when a dog attacks you without provocation while you are acting peaceably in a lawful place — regardless of whether the dog ever bit anyone before. The dog’s past good behavior is legally irrelevant.
Minnesota courts have held that ordinary comparative fault is not a valid defense under the dog bite statute. An owner cannot reduce your recovery simply by claiming you were partly careless. Instead, the owner must show a statutory exception applies — that you provoked the dog, were not acting peaceably, or were somewhere you had no lawful right to be.
Yes. Minn. Stat. § 347.22 applies to any injury a dog causes, not just bites. If a dog knocks you off a bicycle, scratches you, or causes you to fall, the owner can be held strictly liable for those injuries just as for a bite. This broad coverage is one reason Minnesota’s law is considered so protective of victims.
Nothing up front. We handle Minnesota dog bite cases on contingency — you pay no fee unless we recover money for you. Your case review is free, and you can reach us by call, text, email, or chat 24/7.
"*" indicates required fields
"*" indicates required fields
Contact us via call, email, text, or chat to discuss your case.