Available 24/7
Available 24/7
A serious dog attack in North Dakota can mean emergency surgery, permanent scarring, lost wages, and lasting trauma. North Dakota is one of only a handful of states with no dog bite statute on the books. Instead, liability is governed by court decisions applying ordinary negligence and the common-law ‘one-bite’ rule — which makes what the owner knew, and what a lawyer can prove, decisive.
That framework rewards early, thorough investigation. At Dog Bite Laws, we build the negligence and prior-knowledge record North Dakota law demands so victims recover the full compensation available — medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering.
Economic damages are the direct, measurable financial losses caused by the attack. These include emergency room bills, hospitalization costs, surgery fees (including reconstructive or plastic surgery for scarring), follow-up medical appointments, prescribed medications, wound care, and physical therapy or rehabilitation. If injuries require ongoing treatment, future medical expenses are also recoverable.
Lost wages cover income you missed during recovery. If the injuries affect your ability to work long-term, for example, nerve damage to your hands, or PTSD that prevents you returning to your previous role, loss of future earning capacity can also be claimed. These figures are typically supported by employer records, tax returns, and expert testimony.
Non-economic damages cover the human cost of the attack. Pain and suffering accounts for the physical discomfort experienced during and after the injury. Emotional distress covers anxiety, depression, nightmares, and the lasting fear of dogs that many victims develop, particularly children. PTSD is common after dog attacks and has real, documentable medical value in a claim.
Permanent scarring or disfigurement carries significant weight, especially when it is visible on the face, neck, or hands. Loss of enjoyment covers activities the victim can no longer participate in due to physical or psychological limitations. Loss of consortium may be claimed by a spouse or family member when the attack meaningfully disrupts the victim’s relationships and family life.
If the victim is a minor, parents or legal guardians can file on their behalf for both economic and non-economic damages. Claims involving children often reach higher values due to the long-term duration of disfigurement and the psychological impact that can follow a child into adulthood.
With dog bite cases, punitive damages do not apply. They are reserved for situations where the dog owner’s conduct was especially reckless or malicious. For example, knowingly keeping a dog with a documented history of attacks without any precautions, or allowing an aggressive dog to roam free in a populated area after prior warnings. When punitive damages are available, they can significantly increase total recovery above compensatory amounts.
Several factors shape the final settlement value. The severity of the injury such as a deep facial wound requiring multiple surgeries, can settle for far more than a bite that heals cleanly. The visibility of scarring, the victim’s age, available insurance coverage, quality of medical documentation, and strength of the liability argument all play a role.
Our team has recovered over $1M in individual dog bite settlements. See real case results including a $505,000 settlement for a facial bite and a $295,000 recovery for a three-year-old victim. For a quick estimate of your own case value, use our dog bite settlement calculator.
The steps you take in the first 24 to 48 hours after a dog bite directly affect your ability to recover full compensation. Evidence disappears fast and early mistakes can be used against you.
Contact a North Dakota dog bite lawyer before accepting any settlement offer. Early offers typically undervalue long-term medical costs and non-economic damages. Once you accept, you generally cannot reopen the claim.
North Dakota gives dog bite victims six years from the date of the attack to file a personal injury lawsuit (N.D. Cent. Code § 28-01-16). That is one of the longer deadlines in the country, but it is not a reason to wait — evidence fades and witnesses move on long before six years pass.
For children injured by a dog, the deadline is generally extended, but you should never assume extra time applies to your case. Because a North Dakota claim depends on proving prior knowledge and negligence, the sooner records are gathered and fault evidence preserved, the stronger the case.
Dog bite settlements are paid through the dog owner’s homeowners or renters insurance policy. Standard homeowners policies typically include personal liability coverage between $100,000 and $300,000, and that coverage applies to dog bite incidents even when the attack happens away from the insured property. If the bite occurred at a rental property, the landlord’s policy may also apply.
Insurance companies will work to minimize what they pay. They may claim the bite was provoked, challenge the severity of injuries, or dispute liability. Having a dog bite lawyer handle all communication with the insurer protects your claim from being undervalued before you fully understand the scope of your damages.
Because North Dakota has no dog bite statute, liability comes from case law. In Sendelbach v. Grad, the North Dakota Supreme Court held that a dog owner’s liability rests on a combination of scienter (knowledge of the dog’s dangerous tendencies) and negligence. To recover, a victim generally must show the owner owed a duty to control the dog, breached that duty, and that the breach proximately caused the injuries.
This means the value of a North Dakota case often turns on proving the owner knew, or should have known, the dog was dangerous — and then failed to act reasonably. Evidence of prior bites, aggressive behavior, complaints, or violations of local animal-control rules can be the difference between a full recovery and no recovery at all.
Under the one-bite rule, a victim typically must prove the owner knew or should have known of the dog’s vicious or dangerous propensities. A dog with a documented bite history, a ‘beware of dog’ sign, or a pattern of lunging and growling can establish that knowledge.
Because so much depends on the owner’s awareness, preserving evidence early is essential. We move quickly to gather veterinary and animal-control records, prior-complaint history, and witness accounts before that proof disappears.
For a full breakdown of the laws, liability rules, and reporting requirements, see our dedicated North Dakota dog bite laws guide.
Even where prior knowledge is hard to prove, a North Dakota victim can often recover through ordinary negligence. Negligence requires showing the owner owed a duty to control the dog, breached it, and that the breach proximately caused the injuries — for example, letting a large dog roam unleashed near a playground.
Violating a local leash law or animal-control ordinance can support negligence per se, where breaking a safety law is treated as evidence of negligence itself. Because North Dakota leaves dangerous-dog rules largely to cities and counties, we examine every applicable local ordinance to maximize recovery.
The dog’s owner is the primary defendant in most North Dakota cases, but responsibility can extend further. A keeper or harborer who cared for the dog, a landlord who knew a dangerous dog lived on the property and did nothing, or a parent of a minor owner may all share liability.
Identifying every responsible party matters because it can open additional insurance coverage — often the difference between a policy that fully covers your injuries and one that falls short.
Provocation is the defense insurers raise most often, claiming the victim triggered the attack. Ordinary reactions — flinching, walking past, or protecting a child — are not provocation, and we push back hard on inflated versions of events.
North Dakota follows modified comparative fault. A victim’s damages are reduced by their share of fault, and recovery is barred entirely if the victim’s fault is 50% or more (N.D. Cent. Code § 32-03.2-02). Insurers use this rule to shift blame, so countering it with witness statements, medical evidence, and a clear account of the attack is central to a North Dakota dog bite case.
Dog attacks are a serious and rising cost nationwide: U.S. insurers paid about $1.86 billion across 28,450 dog-related injury claims, an average of roughly $65,450 per claim, and more than 5,200 postal workers were attacked by dogs in 2025. Dog attacks on mail carriers are most concentrated in the Midwest and Plains, where USPS data show the highest regional rate in the country — about 5.24 attacks per 100,000 households, roughly 75% higher than in the South (NBC News analysis of USPS data, 2024).
North Dakota stands out because it has no dog bite statute at all — a gap that makes skilled negligence advocacy especially important for victims here.
With no statewide standard, dangerous-dog rules are set locally: cities like Fargo and Bismarck define and regulate dangerous dogs through their own municipal codes, often requiring secure confinement, muzzling, and liability insurance. A prior local ‘dangerous dog’ designation can be powerful evidence of the owner’s knowledge in your civil claim.
Dog Bite Laws is led by Michael Agruss, Managing Partner and personal injury attorney with a track record of results in dog bite cases. He is supported by Michael Bertucci, Taylor Kosla Unterberg, and Zara Saiyed, a team that handles dog bite cases across North Dakota and multiple other states.
The firm has recovered millions of dollars for dog bite victims. These results reflect the firm’s approach: identify every liable party, document every dollar of damages, and push for a full settlement before resorting to trial.
The team is available 24/7 and takes every case on a contingency basis. There are no upfront legal fees and no costs unless we win.
Read more client testimonials or contact us directly for a free, confidential case review.
North Dakota’s statute of limitations for personal injury is six years from the date of the bite under N.D. Cent. Code § 28-01-16 — one of the longest in the nation. Claims involving children may have more time, but missing the deadline generally ends your right to recover. See our full North Dakota dog bite laws guide for how deadlines are calculated.
Often, yes. North Dakota has no dog bite statute, so recovery usually rests on negligence and the one-bite rule from Sendelbach v. Grad, which requires showing the owner knew or should have known the dog was dangerous. Evidence of prior bites, aggression, or complaints is therefore central. If knowledge is hard to prove, we can still pursue an ordinary negligence claim.
North Dakota follows modified comparative fault. Your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault, and if you are found 50% or more at fault under N.D. Cent. Code § 32-03.2-02, you can be barred from recovering anything. Insurers exploit this rule, which is why having a lawyer build and protect your version of events matters so much in North Dakota.
Because North Dakota has no statewide dog bite or dangerous-dog statute, cities and counties set their own rules. Fargo, Bismarck, and other municipalities define dangerous or vicious dogs by ordinance and can require confinement, muzzling, and insurance. A prior local dangerous-dog designation can help prove the owner knew the dog was dangerous in your civil case.
Nothing up front. We handle North Dakota dog bite cases on contingency — you pay no fee unless we recover money for you. Your case review is free, and you can reach us by call, text, email, or chat 24/7.
"*" indicates required fields
"*" indicates required fields
Contact us via call, email, text, or chat to discuss your case.