Available 24/7
Available 24/7
A serious dog attack in Nevada can mean emergency surgery, permanent scarring, lost wages, and lasting trauma. Nevada has no strict-liability dog bite statute. Instead, it is a common-law ‘one-bite’ state, where recovery generally turns on negligence and on whether the owner knew (or should have known) that their dog was dangerous.
That makes evidence everything. At Dog Bite Laws, we build the record of the owner’s knowledge and carelessness that Nevada law requires, so victims recover the full compensation they deserve: medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering.
Economic damages are the direct, measurable financial losses caused by the attack. These include emergency room bills, hospitalization costs, surgery fees (including reconstructive or plastic surgery for scarring), follow-up medical appointments, prescribed medications, wound care, and physical therapy or rehabilitation. If injuries require ongoing treatment, future medical expenses are also recoverable.
Lost wages cover income you missed during recovery. If the injuries affect your ability to work long-term, for example, nerve damage to your hands, or PTSD that prevents you returning to your previous role, loss of future earning capacity can also be claimed. These figures are typically supported by employer records, tax returns, and expert testimony.
Non-economic damages cover the human cost of the attack. Pain and suffering accounts for the physical discomfort experienced during and after the injury. Emotional distress covers anxiety, depression, nightmares, and the lasting fear of dogs that many victims develop, particularly children. PTSD is common after dog attacks and has real, documentable medical value in a claim.
Permanent scarring or disfigurement carries significant weight, especially when it is visible on the face, neck, or hands. Loss of enjoyment covers activities the victim can no longer participate in due to physical or psychological limitations. Loss of consortium may be claimed by a spouse or family member when the attack meaningfully disrupts the victim’s relationships and family life.
If the victim is a minor, parents or legal guardians can file on their behalf for both economic and non-economic damages. Claims involving children often reach higher values due to the long-term duration of disfigurement and the psychological impact that can follow a child into adulthood.
With dog bite cases, punitive damages do not apply. They are reserved for situations where the dog owner’s conduct was especially reckless or malicious. For example, knowingly keeping a dog with a documented history of attacks without any precautions, or allowing an aggressive dog to roam free in a populated area after prior warnings. When punitive damages are available, they can significantly increase total recovery above compensatory amounts.
Several factors shape the final settlement value. The severity of the injury such as a deep facial wound requiring multiple surgeries, can settle for far more than a bite that heals cleanly. The visibility of scarring, the victim’s age, available insurance coverage, quality of medical documentation, and strength of the liability argument all play a role.
Our team has recovered over $1M in individual dog bite settlements. See real case results including a $505,000 settlement for a facial bite and a $295,000 recovery for a three-year-old victim. For a quick estimate of your own case value, use our dog bite settlement calculator.
The steps you take in the first 24 to 48 hours after a dog bite directly affect your ability to recover full compensation. Evidence disappears fast and early mistakes can be used against you.
Contact a Nevada dog bite lawyer before accepting any settlement offer. Early offers typically undervalue long-term medical costs and non-economic damages. Once you accept, you generally cannot reopen the claim.
Nevada gives dog bite victims two years from the date of the attack to file a personal injury lawsuit (NRS 11.190(4)(e)). For children injured by a dog, the deadline is generally tolled until they reach adulthood, but you should never assume extra time applies to your case.
Two years can pass quickly while you focus on recovery, and because Nevada requires proof of the owner’s knowledge, the evidence you need can vanish fast. Prior-incident records must be tracked down, witnesses located, insurance coverage identified, and responsible parties confirmed. Contacting an attorney early protects both your health and your claim.
Dog bite settlements are paid through the dog owner’s homeowners or renters insurance policy. Standard homeowners policies typically include personal liability coverage between $100,000 and $300,000, and that coverage applies to dog bite incidents even when the attack happens away from the insured property. If the bite occurred at a rental property, the landlord’s policy may also apply.
Insurance companies will work to minimize what they pay. They may claim the bite was provoked, challenge the severity of injuries, or dispute liability. Having a dog bite lawyer handle all communication with the insurer protects your claim from being undervalued before you fully understand the scope of your damages.
Unlike strict-liability states, Nevada has not enacted a civil dog bite statute. Nevada courts instead apply common-law negligence rules to dog attack cases. To recover, a victim generally must show the owner owed a duty to keep the dog under reasonable control, breached that duty, and thereby proximately caused the injuries.
Nevada also recognizes the ‘one-bite’ (scienter) theory: liability is strongly supported when the owner knew, or had reason to know, the dog was vicious or dangerous. A prior bite, aggressive lunging, or menacing behavior the owner was aware of can be the difference between a winning and a losing case, which is why investigating the dog’s history is critical.
Because Nevada has no strict-liability statute, the owner’s knowledge of the dog’s dangerous tendencies is often the central battleground. Evidence of a prior bite, complaints to animal control, warning signs, aggressive containment, or neighbors’ accounts of past incidents can establish that the owner knew or should have known the dog posed a risk.
Building that record early (before witnesses scatter and records are purged) is one of the most important things a Nevada dog bite attorney does. The stronger the proof of prior knowledge, the stronger your claim for full damages.
For a full breakdown of the laws, liability rules, and reporting requirements, see our dedicated Nevada dog bite laws guide.
Even without a strict-liability statute, a Nevada victim has more than one route to recover. Beyond common-law negligence and the one-bite theory, an owner’s violation of a leash law or animal-control ordinance can support negligence per se, where breaking a safety law is itself treated as evidence of negligence.
Local ordinances matter in Nevada. Clark County and other jurisdictions impose their own dangerous-dog and leash requirements, and a violation of one of these rules can significantly strengthen a claim. We investigate every available theory to maximize your recovery.
The dog’s owner is the primary defendant in most Nevada cases, but responsibility can extend further. A keeper or harborer who cared for the dog, a landlord who knew a dangerous dog lived on the property and did nothing, or a parent of a minor owner may all share liability.
Identifying every responsible party matters because it can open additional insurance coverage, often the difference between a policy that fully covers your injuries and one that falls short.
Lack of knowledge is the defense that defines Nevada cases. Because there is no strict-liability statute, insurers argue the owner had no idea the dog would bite, so we assemble the evidence of prior incidents, complaints, and warnings that proves otherwise. Provocation is the next most common defense, and ordinary reactions like flinching or protecting a child are not provocation.
Nevada follows modified comparative negligence with a 51% bar. Under NRS 41.141, your damages are reduced by your share of fault, and you are barred from recovering only if your fault is found to be greater than the combined fault of everyone you are suing: that is, 51% or more. As long as you are 50% or less at fault, you can still recover a reduced award.
Dog attacks are a serious and rising cost nationwide: U.S. insurers paid about $1.86 billion across 28,450 dog-related injury claims, an average of roughly $65,450 per claim, and more than 5,200 postal workers were attacked by dogs in 2025. An average of slightly more than 2,500 dog bites were reported to animal control each year over the prior five years, across Clark County, Las Vegas, North Las Vegas and Henderson combined: about seven Clark County residents bitten by dogs every day (Las Vegas Review-Journal (citing Clark County, Las Vegas, North Las Vegas and Henderson animal control data), 2017).
Nevada feels this acutely: Clark County alone averages more than 2,500 reported dog bites each year: roughly seven people bitten every single day.
Because Nevada has no strict-liability statute, those thousands of victims must prove owner knowledge or negligence to recover. Nevada does maintain a criminal dangerous-and-vicious-dog law (NRS 202.500), and a dog previously flagged under it can be strong evidence of the owner’s knowledge in your civil claim.
Dog Bite Laws is led by Michael Agruss, Managing Partner and personal injury attorney with a track record of results in dog bite cases. He is supported by Michael Bertucci, Taylor Kosla Unterberg, and Zara Saiyed, a team that handles dog bite cases across Nevada and multiple other states.
The firm has recovered millions of dollars for dog bite victims. These results reflect the firm’s approach: identify every liable party, document every dollar of damages, and push for a full settlement before resorting to trial.
The team is available 24/7 and takes every case on a contingency basis. There are no upfront legal fees and no costs unless we win.
Read more client testimonials or contact us directly for a free, confidential case review.
Nevada’s statute of limitations for personal injury is two years from the date of the bite under NRS 11.190(4)(e). Claims involving children are generally tolled until adulthood, but missing the deadline otherwise ends your right to recover. See our full Nevada dog bite laws guide for detail on how deadlines are calculated.
Often, yes: this is what sets Nevada apart. Because Nevada has no strict-liability statute, you generally must show the owner knew or should have known the dog was dangerous, or that the owner was otherwise negligent. Evidence of a prior bite, aggressive behavior, or complaints to animal control can be decisive.
Nevada follows modified comparative negligence with a 51% bar (NRS 41.141). Your compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault, and you are barred from recovering only if you are found more than 50% at fault. Insurers often argue provocation to shift blame, which is why documenting what actually happened matters.
Yes. Nevada is a common-law ‘one-bite’ state, so claims proceed under negligence and the scienter (owner-knowledge) theory, and often under negligence per se when a leash or animal-control law was violated. Local ordinances in places like Clark County can add another basis for liability. A lawyer’s job is to marshal the evidence these theories require.
Nothing up front. We handle Nevada dog bite cases on contingency: you pay no fee unless we recover money for you. Your case review is free, and you can reach us by call, text, email, or chat 24/7.
"*" indicates required fields
"*" indicates required fields
Contact us via call, email, text, or chat to discuss your case.