Hoạt động 24/7
Hoạt động 24/7
Nevada has no statute that makes a dog owner automatically responsible for a bite. A Nevada dog bite case is a negligence claim: you show that the owner, or someone else responsible for the dog, failed to act with reasonable care and that this caused your injury. Nevada’s dog bite decisions have looked closely at what the defendant knew about the dog before the attack. Nevada’s dangerous dog law, NRS 202.500, is a criminal statute, and the state uses modified comparative fault, so your own share of blame cuts your award and ends the claim only if it is greater than the defendants’ share.
This page covers how a Nevada negligence case is built, what proof of a dog’s history looks like, local leash rules in Clark County, Washoe County, and the cities, who can be responsible besides the owner, defenses and fault, a child’s case, landlords, deadlines and claims against government, damages and caps, the dangerous dog statute, rabies reporting and quarantine, settlements, and the insurance law Nevada changed in 2025. One correction to make up front: a quotation you will see on many websites, that Nevada rejected the one bite rule in a 1971 case, comes from a dissenting opinion in an obscenity case, not from a dog bite decision.
Dog Bite Laws handles dog attack cases. Talk to us for free, and pay no fee unless we recover money for you.
Nevada has no dog bite statute that holds an owner liable no matter how careful the owner was. The Nevada Revised Statutes say plenty about dogs, but the main dog provision, NRS 202.500, sits in the criminal code and sets misdemeanor and felony penalties for keeping a vicious dog. It does not give a bite victim a civil claim.
So a Nevada case runs on the general rule in NRS 41.130: when a person suffers personal injury through the “wrongful act, neglect or default of another,” the person who caused it is liable for damages. In a dog case that means proving someone responsible for the dog did not use reasonable care. In the Supreme Court of Nevada’s leading dog bite decision, Wright v. Schum (1989), the boy who was mauled won a jury verdict against the dog’s owners, and the court reinstated his separate negligence claim against their landlord.
About that one bite quotation. Many sites say the Supreme Court of Nevada rejected the one bite rule in Glass v. Eighth Judicial District Court (1971), quoting the line that a dog is no longer entitled to one free bite. We read the opinion. Glass is about the state’s obscenity statute and the seizure of two films, and the dog sentence appears in a dissent, where a justice used it as an analogy. It is not a Nevada holding about dogs.
What the Supreme Court of Nevada has applied in its dog bite decisions is ordinary negligence. In Wright, the court weighed what the landlord knew or should have known about the dog, how likely serious injury was if the dog escaped, and how slight the burden of preventing it was.
A Nevada negligence claim has four parts: duty, breach, causation, and damages. In Butler v. Bayer (2007), the Supreme Court of Nevada said a defendant is entitled to judgment without a trial if any one of them is clearly lacking as a matter of law. In plain words, the person you sue had a responsibility to keep the dog from hurting people, failed at it, that failure caused your injury, and the injury cost you something.
The dog’s history matters because it shows what the defendant knew. In Wright, the court held a jury could find the landlord knew the pit bull could be dangerous to others if it escaped: a neighbor had told him the dog had twice escaped and attacked her family’s dogs and lunged at them through the fence, a “Beware of the Dog” sign hung on the front door, and he had promised to take care of the problem. Two dissenting justices argued that knowing a dog attacks other dogs is not the same as knowing it will attack a person.
The evidence that builds a Nevada case:
That last item matters most when the dog has no known history.
Nevada leaves leash rules to local governments. NRS 244.359 lets each board of county commissioners regulate or prohibit animals running at large, across the whole county or in limited areas. Where you were bitten decides which rule applies.
Why it matters for your claim: in Vega v. Eastern Courtyard Associates (2001), the Supreme Court of Nevada held that violating a building code provision adopted by county ordinance is negligence per se, meaning negligence as a matter of law, when the injured person belongs to the class of people the provision is intended to protect and suffered the type of injury it was intended to prevent. Vega was about a building code ramp, not a dog, and the court said whether a local ordinance sets the standard of care in a negligence case is a question of law for the judge. Whether a particular leash or at large rule will be treated the same way is for the court in your case to decide.
Either way, get the animal control report showing the dog was at large, because that dated record is hard to argue with later.
Because Nevada claims run on negligence, the question is not only who owned the dog but who had a duty to control it. That can be more than one person. In Wright and Harry, the Supreme Court of Nevada looked past the dog’s owners to the people who controlled the property where the dog lived.
Nevada statutes do not define owner or keeper for civil cases. NRS 202.500 refers to a dog’s “owner or keeper” without defining either word. The state’s rabies regulations do define “owner of an animal” broadly, as any person “keeping, harboring, having custody of or control of an animal,” or letting it stay in their home or on their property, but that definition, in NAC 441A.135, is written for quarantine and vaccination rules, not for deciding who pays you.
Being connected to a dog is not the same as being responsible for it. In PetSmart v. Eighth Judicial District Court (2021), a man was badly bitten by a dog his wife had adopted two days earlier at an adoption event inside a PetSmart store. The dog had been adopted and returned several times for aggression. The family sued the rescue group, PetSmart, and others. The Supreme Court of Nevada held the store could be liable only if it had taken on a duty of care or had an agency relationship with the rescue group, and it had done neither.
Finding every responsible person matters in Nevada. Under NRS 41.141, when recovery is allowed against more than one negligent defendant, each one generally pays only its own percentage of the fault, with exceptions such as strict liability, intentional torts, and concerted acts. If one defendant has no insurance or assets, the others do not cover that defendant’s share. For background, read what determines ownership of a dog.
With no dog bite statute, Nevada has no list of statutory defenses. The owner’s insurer will still raise the familiar ones, and here is how each works.
Provocation. NRS 202.500 defines a dog as provoked when it is “tormented or subjected to pain,” and says a dog may not be found dangerous or vicious because of a defensive act against someone who was committing a crime or who provoked it. Those rules decide whether a dog gets a criminal designation; NRS 202.500 does not create a defense to a civil claim. If the owner’s insurer argues that you were careless around the dog, that is a comparative negligence argument, judged under NRS 41.141 as explained below. Our article on dog bite provocation explains what insurers mean by it.
Assumption of risk. In Mizushima v. Sunset Ranch (1987), the Supreme Court of Nevada held that, except for express assumption of risk, the assumption of risk doctrine has been folded into Nevada’s comparative negligence statute, so it is weighed as part of comparative fault rather than as a separate defense. Express assumption of risk survives because it comes from a contract that relieves the defendant of a duty of care. That matters for groomers, boarders, dog daycare workers, and volunteers who signed a written waiver. Read the document before assuming it ends your claim.
Trespass. Nevada does not decide a property owner’s duty by labeling the injured person a trespasser, licensee, or invitee. In Moody v. Manny’s Auto Repair (1994), the court said recovery should depend on whether the owner acted reasonably under the circumstances, not on the injured person’s status. Someone on the property without permission may face a fault argument, but the label does not close the case.
Nevada uses modified comparative negligence. NRS 41.141 says a plaintiff’s own negligence “does not bar a recovery if that negligence was not greater than the negligence or gross negligence of the parties to the action against whom recovery is sought.” The jury decides the total damages without regard to your fault, then assigns a percentage to each party, and your award is reduced by your share.
The arithmetic, using a $100,000 verdict as an example:
Three Nevada details change real cases. First, the comparison is against the parties you are recovering from, combined, which is another reason to sue everyone responsible. Second, if one defendant settles before judgment, the jury does not hear about that defendant’s fault or the settlement amount, and the judge subtracts the settlement from what the remaining defendants owe. Third, comparative negligence is something the defense must raise: the statute applies where it “is asserted as a defense,” and Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure 8(c) lists contributory negligence among the defenses a party must state in its answer.
In a dog bite case the fault argument nearly always targets the victim’s own conduct around the dog: entering a yard, reaching over a fence, ignoring a warning, or trying to break up a dog fight. Be careful what you say to the owner’s insurer about how it happened, because those words become the percentage.
Both of Nevada’s leading landlord decisions involved a boy hurt by a dog that had escaped from a yard.
A child has longer to bring a claim than an adult. NRS 11.250 says that while a person is under 18, that time is not counted toward the limitation period. A child bitten at age 6 therefore has until two years after turning 18, the 20th birthday. A parent’s own claims, such as medical bills the parent paid, should be reviewed right away rather than assumed to share the child’s longer clock.
Expect the owner’s insurer to talk about what your child did. Nevada’s comparative fault statute does not set an age below which a child cannot be found partly at fault, and the dangerous dog statute describes a provoked dog as one that is “tormented or subjected to pain.” Read whether a child can provoke a dog before you accept an adjuster’s version.
Two practical rules for parents. Any settlement of a child’s disputed claim must be approved by a district court under NRS 41.200, and if the child’s net share is more than $2,500 it must go into a blocked account or other court-approved investment that can be reached only by court order or when the child turns 18. And do not settle a child’s claim before a doctor can say whether scars will need further treatment.
Nevada’s rule on landlords comes from two Supreme Court of Nevada decisions, and the short version is that a landlord is not liable just for being the landlord.
In Wright v. Schum (1989), an eleven-year-old was mauled on his way home from swimming by a tenant’s pit bull that had escaped. The court refused to make landlords liable merely because they knew a tenant had a dangerous dog and could have evicted the tenant. It said failing to evict a tenant known to be harboring a dangerous dog will not alone make a landlord liable.
But Schum had done more than know. After neighbors complained, he used his power over the tenants to impose a plan: keep the dog in the house or on a chain, or move out. The front gate was broken and wedged open, and everyone knew it. The court held that by using his power to evict to control the dog, the landlord took on a duty of care and could be found negligent in how he carried it out. The boy’s claim against him went back for trial.
In Harry v. Smith (1995), the court restated the rule: a landowner who simply knows of a dangerous condition, or passively allows it, has no duty to people hurt off the property, and liability requires affirmative steps to assume a duty. It also held there was a factual dispute over whether the owner, through family members who managed the house for her, had taken on that duty, so the claim against her went back to the trial court. There the dog had bitten a houseguest without provocation, and it escaped through a sagging chain link fence only two feet high at the spot. The co-owner whose only link was her name on the title was not liable.
Both Supreme Court cases involved bites off the rental property, and neither decided a bite in a common area that a landlord or homeowners association controls.
Two years from the date of the bite. NRS 11.190(4)(e) gives two years for an action to recover damages for injuries to a person, or for a death, caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another.
Treat these as outside limits. The deadlines that decide Nevada cases are much shorter: the ten day quarantine, the animal control investigation, and the weeks before a neighbor forgets what the dog did last spring. In a negligence state, the dog’s history is the evidence, and it disappears first. Our guide to the dog bite statute of limitations explains how these clocks work together.
Nevada’s public health rules define an “animal bite” as the “breaking of the skin by the teeth of an animal,” and Nevada’s criminal law measures the worst attacks by “substantial bodily harm,” which NRS 0.060 defines to include serious permanent disfigurement, protracted loss or impairment of a body part, and prolonged physical pain. Those words describe what drives the value of a civil claim too.
The boy in Wright v. Schum was left permanently disfigured. Do not settle until your doctors can say whether an injury like that is permanent.
A Nevada dog bite victim can recover economic damages, such as medical bills, future treatment, scar revision, counseling, and lost wages, and noneconomic damages for pain, disfigurement, and emotional distress. The noneconomic damages cap people sometimes cite, NRS 41A.035, applies to professional negligence claims against health care providers, not to a claim against a dog owner. The cap on claims against government is covered below.
Punitive damages. NRS 42.005 allows punitive damages when the victim proves by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant was guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice. Under NRS 42.001, malice includes “despicable conduct” engaged in with a conscious disregard of the safety of others, and conscious disregard means knowing the probable harmful consequences of a wrongful act and willfully and deliberately failing to act to avoid them. Punitive awards are capped at three times compensatory damages when those are $100,000 or more, and at $300,000 when compensatory damages are less than $100,000. An employer is liable for punitive damages over an employee’s conduct only in limited situations.
Claims against government. If the defendant is the state, a county, a city, or a public employee acting on the job, NRS 41.035 caps the award at $200,000 per claimant, plus interest after judgment, and bars punitive damages.
Wrongful death. Under NRS 41.085, the heirs may recover for their grief, sorrow, lost support, and companionship, and the estate may recover medical and funeral expenses and any punitive damages the person could have recovered. Our guide to dog bite compensation covers each category in more depth.
NRS 202.500 sorts dogs into two categories, and both turn on behavior.
The penalties fall on the owner or keeper. Knowingly keeping a vicious dog for more than seven days after actual notice that it is vicious, or transferring it, is a misdemeanor. If substantial bodily harm results from an attack by a dog known to be vicious, the owner or keeper commits a category D felony, which carries one to four years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000 under NRS 193.130, and the judge may order the dog humanely destroyed.
Breed does not count. Since a 2013 amendment, Assembly Bill 110, a dog may not be found dangerous or vicious based solely on its breed, and no county or city may adopt or enforce an ordinance that does so. In Nevada the dog’s conduct is what matters. A dog also may not be labeled dangerous or vicious for defending against someone committing a crime or someone who provoked it.
None of this hands a victim money directly. What it gives a civil case is a record: a prior dangerous finding, or a law enforcement notice to the owner that the dog is dangerous, shows the owner had been told. Counties may also designate an animal as inherently dangerous and require its owner to carry liability insurance under NRS 244.359, and Washoe County’s posted code has its own dangerous dog determination and registration rules.
Nevada treats a bite from a rabies-susceptible animal, which includes every dog, as a reportable communicable disease. Under the state’s regulations, a health care provider who treats the bite must report it within 24 hours to the local health authority or the designated rabies control authority. Clark County Animal Protection Services goes further and says all bites from a warm-blooded mammal to a human must be reported to it. Northern Nevada Public Health asks anyone bitten in Washoe County to fill out a report. Here is what happens after a dog bite is reported.
The local rabies control authority must investigate each report. A dog that has bitten a person is quarantined and observed for ten days after the bite, even if its vaccination is current, under NAC 441A.425. The owner pays the costs, and in Clark County the quarantine may be at home, at a shelter, or at a veterinarian. If the dog shows signs of rabies during those ten days it is euthanized and tested at the state agriculture lab. Nobody may destroy the head of a dog that bit a person without the authority’s permission.
The Southern Nevada Health District explains the medical point: if the dog is alive and healthy ten days after the bite, it was not infected with rabies when it bit. Whether you need shots is for your doctor and the health department to decide. Wash every bite with soap and water right away and get it seen.
Nevada requires dog owners to keep their dogs currently vaccinated against rabies, and each county, city, and town must run a rabies control program. If the owner cannot prove vaccination, read about being bitten by an unvaccinated dog.
The best-known national insurance data does not give a Nevada average, and an average would say little about your claim anyway. The best national figure comes from insurance claims. For 2025, the Insurance Information Institute and State Farm reported 28,450 dog-related injury claims nationwide, with an average cost per claim of $65,450. Their report singled out California and Florida for the most claims and New York for the highest average, and it did not break out a Nevada figure. That national number blends every claim, small and large. It is not a settlement value and it does not predict any one case.
What actually moves the number in a Nevada case:
Our overview of dog bite settlement amounts explains how injury levels are usually valued, the page on minor dog bite settlements covers smaller cases, and the dog bite settlement calculator gives a rough sense of ranges.
In most Nevada dog bite cases the money comes from a homeowners or renters liability policy, not from the owner’s savings. The Insurance Information Institute says standard homeowners and renters policies typically cover dog bite liability up to the policy’s liability limits, usually $100,000 to $300,000, and that the owner is responsible for anything above that.
Nevada changed its insurance law on dog breeds in 2025. Since 2021, NRS 687B.383 had barred insurers from refusing, canceling, refusing to renew, or raising the price of certain policies solely because of a dog’s breed. Senate Bill 166, passed in the 2025 session, removed the word “solely,” so breed cannot be a basis at all, and added policies covering multi-family residential buildings to the list, which already included homeowners, renters, manufactured and mobile home, and umbrella policies.
Two details matter to a victim. The law has an exception for a particular dog that is known to be dangerous or vicious, or has been declared so under NRS 202.500, so for a dog with a record the insurer may have refused, canceled, or declined to renew the policy, or raised the premium. And an insurer may not ask about breed at all, only whether the dog is known or declared to be dangerous or vicious.
The practical point: in Nevada a pit bull or other targeted breed is no reason to assume the owner has no coverage. Get the name of the insurer, ask about umbrella coverage, and do not take the owner’s word that there is no policy. A landlord’s or homeowners association’s own liability policy may also matter if they share responsibility.
For the full process from start to finish, read our guide on how to file a dog bite claim.
Dog Bite Laws handles dog attack cases, and Nevada is a state where the evidence has to be found, not assumed. Without a strict liability statute, your case depends on what the owner knew and how the dog got loose. Our work is to pull the animal control and quarantine files, find the earlier complaints and the neighbors who saw them, check the local leash rules where you were bitten, identify every person and business that shares responsibility so that several liability does not leave money on the table, and locate every policy that might pay.
We deal with the insurer so that you do not have to, and we push back when an adjuster tries to turn a walk past a yard into a percentage of fault. We work on a contingency fee, so there is nothing to pay to start and no fee unless we recover money for you. Founding attorney Michael Agruss built the firm around injury clients who need someone else to carry the paperwork.
We take dog bite cases across Nevada, including Las Vegas, Henderson, Reno, North Las Vegas, Sparks, and Carson City. If you or your child was bitten, contact us for a free consultation. We will tell you honestly whether there is a claim worth bringing and what evidence we need to find first.
No. Nevada has no statute that makes a dog owner automatically liable for a bite. A victim brings a negligence claim and must show that the owner or another responsible person failed to use reasonable care. Nevada's dog bite decisions have focused on what the defendant knew about the dog and whether the defendant acted reasonably. Nevada's dangerous dog law, NRS 202.500, sets criminal penalties rather than creating a civil claim.
Not as a rule of Nevada law. The line quoted on many websites, that a dog is no longer entitled to one free bite, comes from a dissenting opinion in Glass v. Eighth Judicial District Court (1971), an obscenity case. The Supreme Court of Nevada's dog bite decisions apply ordinary negligence, and what the defendant knew or should have known about the dog has been central to them, so evidence of earlier attacks, complaints, or warnings matters.
Only in limited situations. The Supreme Court of Nevada has held that a landlord is not liable just because it knew a tenant had a dangerous dog and could have evicted the tenant. A landlord who takes active steps to control the dog, such as imposing a plan to chain or confine it, takes on a duty and can be liable for carrying it out carelessly. Both of those Supreme Court cases involved bites off the rental property.
An adult generally has two years from the date of the bite under NRS 11.190(4)(e). For a child, the time under age 18 does not count, so the deadline is two years after the 18th birthday. A claim against the state, a county, or a city should be filed with the Attorney General or the local governing body within two years under NRS 41.036. That filing is not a precondition to suing the government itself, but under NRS 41.039 it must come first before you sue a county or city employee personally.
Not automatically. Nevada's dangerous dog statute describes provocation as tormenting a dog or causing it pain, but that definition decides criminal designations. In a civil case, a claim that you were careless around the dog is a comparative negligence argument. Under NRS 41.141 your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault and is barred only if your fault is greater than that of the defendants combined. Do not accept an adjuster's description of your own conduct.
It can be important evidence. The City of Las Vegas has its own animal control, while in unincorporated Clark County the county's Animal Protection Services says pets other than cats must be restrained at all times. In Vega (2001), the Supreme Court of Nevada treated a violated building code provision adopted by county ordinance as negligence as a matter of law for someone it was meant to protect; whether a judge will apply that rule to a leash ordinance is decided case by case. Get the animal control report that documents the dog was at large.
The local rabies control authority investigates, and the dog is quarantined and observed for ten days after the bite, even if it is vaccinated. The owner pays the quarantine costs. According to the Southern Nevada Health District, a dog that stays healthy for those ten days was not infected with rabies when it bit. A separate dangerous or vicious finding under NRS 202.500 depends on the dog's behavior, not its breed.
"*" là ký hiệu cho các trường bắt buộc
"*" là ký hiệu cho các trường bắt buộc
Hãy liên hệ với chúng tôi qua điện thoại, email, tin nhắn hoặc trò chuyện trực tuyến để trao đổi về trường hợp của bạn.