Luật sư chuyên về các vụ cắn người do chó gây ra tại Mississippi
Luật sư chuyên về các vụ cắn người do chó gây ra tại Mississippi
On This Page
- Mississippi Dog Bite Law: The Dangerous Propensity Rule, Not a Statute
- What You Must Prove in a Mississippi Dog Bite Case
- Leash Law Violations and What They Prove in Mississippi
- Who Counts as the Owner in Mississippi
- Provocation, Trespass, and Assumption of Risk
- Comparative Fault in Mississippi: The Pure Rule, With No Bar
- When the Victim Is a Child
- Landlord and Property Owner Liability in Mississippi
- Deadlines for Filing a Mississippi Dog Bite Claim
- Types of Dog Bite Injuries and the Real-World Impact
- Bạn có thể được bồi thường những khoản nào?
- Mississippi Dangerous Dog Law and What a Declaration Means
- Reporting a Dog Bite and the Rabies Rules in Mississippi
- Average Dog Bite Settlement in Mississippi
- Homeowner and Renter Insurance for Mississippi Dog Bites
- Steps to Take Right After a Mississippi Dog Bite
- Why Mississippi Victims Choose Dog Bite Laws
- Các câu hỏi thường gặp
- No Bite Statute: Mississippi has no dog bite statute, so a victim recovers by proving the owner was negligent under rules the state Supreme Court built in Poy v. Grayson in 1973.
- Dangerous Propensity: You must show the dog displayed a dangerous propensity before the attack, that the owner knew or should have known it, and that an attack was reasonably foreseeable.
- Growling Can Count: A prior bite is not required. The Supreme Court has held that growling, barking, and chasing can be enough to put an owner on notice.
- Pure Comparative Fault: Under Code section 11-7-15, a bite victim's own carelessness never bars the claim outright; it reduces the award in proportion to the victim's share.
- Three Years: An adult has three years from the bite to sue. A child's clock does not start until age 21, because Mississippi still sets the age of majority at 21.
- Government Claims: A claim against a city, county, or other public body needs written notice at least 90 days before suit and must be brought within one year, with a $500,000 cap.
- $1 Million Cap: Pain, suffering, and disfigurement are capped at $1 million in a dog bite case. Medical bills and lost wages are not capped.
- Landlord Knowledge: In May 2025 the Mississippi Supreme Court held that a landlord is not liable for a tenant's hidden dog unless it actually or constructively knew of the dog's dangerous propensities.
Mississippi has no dog bite statute, so a bitten person must prove the owner was negligent under the dangerous propensity rule. The Mississippi Supreme Court set it out in Poy v. Grayson in 1973: there must be proof that the dog had shown a dangerous propensity before the attack, that the owner knew or reasonably should have known it, and that the owner should have foreseen the dog was likely to attack someone. That proof is harder than in a strict liability state, but it is not limited to an earlier bite. Growling, barking, and chasing can be enough.
This page covers what you must prove, what leash ordinances do and do not add, who can be held responsible, the defenses an insurer will raise, Mississippi’s pure comparative fault rule, a child’s case, landlords after the 2025 TLM Investments decision, the filing deadlines, including the Tort Claims Act notice for public bodies and its 2026 amendment, the damages caps, rabies quarantine, settlement value, and insurance.
Dog Bite Laws handles dog attack cases. Talk to us for free, and pay no fee unless we recover money for you.
Mississippi Dog Bite Law: The Dangerous Propensity Rule, Not a Statute
Many states have a statute that makes a dog’s owner pay for a bite. Mississippi does not, and its Supreme Court said so directly in Poy v. Grayson (1973): while some states impose liability on owners by statute, “that is not the case in Mississippi.” Liability here is built by the courts, case by case, as a form of negligence.
Poy set the test that Mississippi courts still quote. The court required “some proof that the animal has exhibited some dangerous propensity or disposition prior to the attack complained of,” and proof that the owner “knew or reasonably should have known” of it and “reasonably should have foreseen that the animal was likely to attack someone.” In Poy itself a garbage collector was bitten through a fence by a six month old puppy that had never bothered anyone, and the court entered judgment for the owner. Calling the puppy a watch dog was not enough.
People call this the one bite rule, and the name misleads. In Mongeon v. A & V Enterprises (1997) the Supreme Court adopted the view that “any tendency of a dog to injure persons, whether the dog acts from a purpose to do bodily harm, from ill-temper, or only playfulness, is a dangerous propensity.” In Olier v. Bailey (2015) it repeated that an actual physical attack is not necessary, and that barking, growling, and chasing can put an owner on notice.
Olier also called foreseeability “the fulcrum upon which liability turns.” The Supreme Court applied the Poy test to a dog’s owner again on May 8, 2025. So Mississippi dog cases keep returning to the same question: what did this dog do before, and who knew about it?
What You Must Prove in a Mississippi Dog Bite Case
Put in plain terms, a Mississippi claim against a dog’s owner has four parts:
- The dog showed danger before. Some earlier conduct that showed a tendency to injure people: a bite, barking, chasing, or, as in Mongeon, growling at a neighbor in the same spot.
- The owner knew or should have known. Actual knowledge, such as a complaint to the owner, or facts the owner should have picked up on.
- The attack was foreseeable. Given what the owner knew, the owner reasonably should have foreseen that the dog was likely to attack someone.
- The dog caused your injury and you were harmed. Medical records, bills, lost pay, and photographs.
The first two parts can end a case early. In Hawkins v. Hale (2016) the Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for an owner because the bitten man had no proof the dog “ever exhibited a vicious demeanor prior to the attack,” which the court called “fatal to his claim.” In Mongeon, by contrast, a neighbor’s testimony that she had complained to the trailer park managers about the dogs growling at her was enough to send the case to a jury.
The rule also reaches injuries from fleeing, not only bite wounds. In Mongeon the woman, already bitten, fell trying to climb a fence to escape and needed neck surgery, and the Supreme Court reinstated her verdict against the landlord. In Olier the Supreme Court let a woman who broke her arm falling as she fled a goose proceed under the same rule. If that is what happened to you, read about a dog attack without a bite.
Proof of the dog’s past sits with neighbors, delivery drivers, earlier victims, and animal control, and it goes stale fast. The first weeks after a bite matter more than the three year deadline.
Leash Law Violations and What They Prove in Mississippi
We have not found a statewide leash law in Mississippi. State law lets cities regulate animals running at large under Code section 21-19-9, and gives similar power to certain counties described in section 19-5-50, so the actual leash and at large rules are local ordinances that differ from town to town. The one statewide rule on loose dogs, Code section 41-53-11, is about rabies tags: it directs a sheriff or peace officer to hold and then destroy a dog over three months old found running at large without a collar and tag, or without a rabies vaccination.
What a local ordinance violation proves in a civil case depends on the ordinance and the facts. In Hawkins v. Hale the bitten man argued that a violation of Clarksdale’s running at large ordinance amounted to strict liability. The courts never reached that argument, because they found no violation: the dog had been chained in its own yard and broke loose after, by the plaintiff’s own deemed admission, he and his wife yelled and gestured at it.
So do not count on a citation alone to win the case. Earlier citations for the same dog being loose can help show the owner knew it was a problem, so ask animal control for every record on the dog.
Who Counts as the Owner in Mississippi
We have not found a Mississippi statute defining a dog’s owner for a civil claim, so the cases control. The core defendant is the owner.
Ownership at the moment of the bite matters. In Thibodeaux v. Humane Society of South Mississippi (2017) a shelter had quarantined a dog after an earlier bite and later returned it to its owner, who gave it away. The Court of Appeals said the shelter was clearly aware of the dog’s dangerous propensities but was not liable, because it “did not have ownership of the dog at the time it bit” the plaintiff. Knowledge without ownership was not enough.
The Court of Appeals has also said Mississippi law “has yet to extend liability for personal injuries caused by dangerous animals beyond its owner,” apart from landlords for injuries on property they control. That line comes from Kimbrough v. Keenum (2011) and is covered in the landlord section below.
In practice, find out whose name is on the dog’s vet and rabies records. When you are not sure who owned the dog, read what determines ownership of a dog.
Provocation, Trespass, and Assumption of Risk
Because Mississippi has no dog bite statute, there is no statutory list of defenses. In the cases, the owner’s defenses usually take one of three shapes.
Provocation. An insurer will say you teased, startled, or threatened the dog. Hawkins shows how the facts around a bite can matter: the plaintiff was deemed to have admitted that he and his wife provoked the dog by yelling and gesturing at it, and his claim failed because he had no proof of the dog’s earlier behavior. Give an honest, detailed account to your own lawyer before anyone else. More on dog bite provocation.
Trespass. In Olier the Supreme Court said that “no liability can attach when a malicious trespasser is attempting to harm the person, family, or property of the owner,” and noted the long recognized privilege to keep a dog to protect one’s property. The same opinion also said an owner can foresee that visitors arrive unannounced and that “errant children or others may inadvertently or negligently stray onto their property.” Olier was a case about geese, not dogs.
Assumption of risk. This is no longer a separate, complete defense in Mississippi. In Churchill v. Pearl River Basin Development District (1999) the Supreme Court held “once again that the assumption of risk doctrine is subsumed into comparative negligence.” The court added that acts which might be called assumption of risk should not, as a matter of law, be a complete bar to recovery; they go to comparative fault. Churchill was a water park case, not a dog case.
A guest’s status on the property is a separate question. In Olier a visitor was a licensee and lost her premises liability claim, but the Supreme Court held that she could still proceed against the homeowner as the animal’s owner, because the two claims exist independently.
Comparative Fault in Mississippi: The Pure Rule, With No Bar
Mississippi uses pure comparative negligence. Code section 11-7-15 says that in actions for personal injuries the fact that the injured person was negligent “shall not bar a recovery, but damages shall be diminished by the jury in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to the person injured.” There is no 50 or 51 percent cutoff.
Here is what that means with numbers. If a jury values a case at $100,000 and finds the bitten person 20 percent at fault, the award is $80,000. At 60 percent fault the award is $40,000. Even at 90 percent the person recovers something. A 2026 Senate bill that would have added a 50 percent bar for some negligence cases died in committee, and it would not have reached personal injury claims anyway.
There is a catch that matters more in a dog case than in a car wreck. Comparative fault only comes into play after you prove the owner was negligent. In Hawkins the Court of Appeals said comparative negligence was “inapplicable” because the plaintiff could not prove negligence under the dangerous propensity rule in the first place. The fault rule softens a reduction; it does not fill a gap in the proof of the dog’s history.
Expect the insurer to bargain with the rule. Every point of fault assigned to you comes off the claim, and Olier said a jury is “free to distribute fault as it sees fit,” so pin down the facts while witnesses remember them.
When the Victim Is a Child
Mississippi gives children extra time, because it still sets the age of majority at 21. Code sections 1-3-21 and 1-3-27 define an infant and a minor as a person under 21, and section 15-1-59 says that when a person entitled to sue is under the disability of infancy, the limitation period runs only after the disability is removed. Read together, those sections give a child bitten in Mississippi until three years after the twenty-first birthday, the twenty-fourth birthday, to file. A 2026 bill to lower the age of majority to 18 passed the Senate and died in a House committee on March 3, 2026, so the rule stands.
Do not treat that as a reason to wait. The proof that wins a Mississippi case is proof of the dog’s earlier behavior, and it disappears long before a child turns 21. Section 15-1-59’s pause is written for the person under the disability of infancy, so if a parent is pursuing anything in the parent’s own right, such as medical bills the parent paid, raise it with a lawyer early rather than assume it shares the child’s longer clock.
Children are often blamed for a bite. An insurer may say a toddler grabbed the dog or a child ran past it. The owner’s knowledge still matters most: Olier recognized that it may be foreseeable that children will stray onto property, and Mongeon counted even playful aggression as a dangerous propensity. If a child is being blamed, read whether a child can provoke a dog, then get advice before giving any statement.
A settlement made before anyone knows whether a child’s scar will need revision is a real risk, so let the medical picture settle first.
Landlord and Property Owner Liability in Mississippi
The Mississippi Supreme Court restated the law on landlords and tenants’ dogs on May 8, 2025, in TLM Investments, LLC v. Yates. A guest was bitten by a tenant’s pit bull and sued both the tenant and the landlord. The Supreme Court held that while the dog’s owner is judged under the Poy test, the landlord is liable only if it “had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous propensities” of the dog. The tenant had hidden the dog and asked her brother to claim it, so the landlord had neither, and the court entered judgment for the landlord.
The court made three more points worth knowing. The mere presence of a no-pet clause in a lease is not an admission that all dogs are dangerous; the court read that lease’s clause as protecting the property from damage, not people from bites. Knowing that the tenant once kept a different dog, which the landlord had asked her to remove, did not give constructive knowledge of the new one. And the guest was not a party to the lease or an intended third-party beneficiary of it, so she could not use its terms as the basis for her claim.
Landlords can still be liable. In Mongeon the Supreme Court held that a landlord who keeps control of a common area, there a trailer park’s path to the laundry, must have actual or constructive notice of the dog’s dangerous propensities, and found enough evidence where a resident had complained to the managers about the dogs growling and a manager said she would see that the dog was tied up.
There is an outer limit. In Kimbrough v. Keenum (2011) the Court of Appeals held that a landlord owes no duty for attacks on land it neither owns nor controls, even if it knew about the tenant’s dogs. Complaints to a landlord or property manager, like the one in Mongeon, are the evidence to look for.
Deadlines for Filing a Mississippi Dog Bite Claim
Most Mississippi dog bite claims fall under Code section 15-1-49, which gives three years for actions with no other limitation period. The clock starts on the day of the bite.
- Adult bitten by a private person’s dog: three years from the date of the bite.
- Child bitten: three years after the twenty-first birthday.
- A city, county, school district, or state agency is involved: the Mississippi Tort Claims Act applies. Written notice of claim must go to the entity’s chief executive officer at least 90 days before suit (for a county, served on the chancery clerk; for a city, on the city clerk), and the action must be brought within one year of the conduct. Filing the notice tolls the year for 95 days, and after a denial or the end of that period you have 90 more days to sue. Missing that window is, in the statute’s words, “an absolute bar.”
Under Code section 11-46-11 the notice must be in writing, delivered in person or by registered or certified mail, and state the facts, the injury, the time and place, the people involved, the damages sought, and your residence. In Thibodeaux, the bitten woman’s claim against the City of Biloxi was dismissed for failure to properly serve it.
One change took effect July 1, 2026. Senate Bill 2360, which became law without the Governor’s signature on March 26, 2026, requires the Tort Claims Board to publish an online registry of the governmental entities required to have certificates of coverage under the Act, with the name, email address, and mailing address of each one’s chief executive office. If the registry information is wrong when you serve your notice, the one year limit is tolled until it is corrected. The Act also has its own savings clause for children. Claims involving police dogs or animal control can raise immunity questions, so talk to a lawyer well before the year is up.
For how these clocks interact, see our guide to the dog bite statute of limitations.
Types of Dog Bite Injuries and the Real-World Impact
Mississippi’s damages statute lists, among the losses it calls noneconomic, physical impairment, disfigurement, mental anguish, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life. Those words describe what dog attacks actually leave behind.
- Punctures and tears. A dog’s teeth crush as well as cut, and a small puncture can close over bacteria. Watch for a dog bite infection in the days after any bite that broke the skin.
- Facial wounds and scarring. Section 11-1-60 lists disfigurement as a noneconomic loss, so lasting scars belong in the claim, subject to the noneconomic cap described below.
- Fractures and falls. Some Mississippi cases involved serious injuries from falls: a neck fusion after a woman, already bitten, fell from a fence escaping two dogs in Mongeon, and a broken arm when a woman fell fleeing a goose in Olier. A dog can also break bones directly, as we explain in can a dog bite break your arm.
- Rabies shots. Post-exposure treatment is decided by you and your doctor, with the state health department advising, and its cost belongs in the claim.
- Psychological harm. Fear of dogs, nightmares, and anxiety, especially in children. Mississippi counts emotional distress as a recoverable loss, so emotional trauma after a dog attack should be documented by a professional, not just described.
Keep a short record of work missed, school absences, and sleep lost. Those details become the evidence of noneconomic loss.
Bạn có thể được bồi thường những khoản nào?
Mississippi divides damages into two kinds in Code section 11-1-60. Actual economic damages, meaning medical care, rehabilitation, lost earnings and earning capacity, and other objectively verifiable money losses, have no cap. Noneconomic damages, meaning pain, suffering, mental anguish, emotional distress, disfigurement, physical impairment, and loss of enjoyment of life, are capped.
For a dog bite case the cap is $1,000,000 in noneconomic damages. The statute says that in any civil action filed on or after September 1, 2004, other than a medical malpractice action, the jury “shall not award the plaintiff more than” $1,000,000 for noneconomic damages. The jury is not told about the cap; the judge reduces any award above it. Every bill from 2023 through 2026 to change the cap died.
Punitive damages are available only on a demanding showing. Under Code section 11-1-65 you must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant acted with actual malice, gross negligence evidencing a willful, wanton, or reckless disregard for the safety of others, or actual fraud. The jury decides compensatory damages first, and punitive damages are taken up only after that. For a defendant with a net worth of $50 million or less, punitive damages are limited to 2 percent of net worth, with exceptions for injuries caused by conduct leading to a felony conviction or while the defendant was under the influence of alcohol or of drugs other than lawfully prescribed ones.
Claims against a government body follow different rules. Code section 11-46-15 limits liability to $500,000 for all claims from a single occurrence and bars punitive damages and interest before judgment. For more on what each category covers, see dog bite compensation.
Mississippi Dangerous Dog Law and What a Declaration Means
We have not found a statewide dangerous dog designation law in Mississippi. There is no state process for a court or animal control officer to declare a dog dangerous and attach statewide restrictions. Lawmakers have tried: House Bill 530 in 2023 would have created a complaint process when someone is injured, and it died in committee. In 2024, House Bill 413 would have let a court order a biting dog chained or euthanized and award a victim’s actual expenses “regardless of the propensity of the dog.” It passed the House and died in a Senate committee on April 2, 2024.
Any dangerous dog rules that apply come from local ordinances, so check the ordinance where the bite happened.
For a civil claim, a local designation is not what creates liability. What it gives you is the evidence the dangerous propensity rule demands: an official, dated record that the dog had already shown aggression and that the owner was told. A prior designation, an earlier bite report, an animal control warning, or an earlier quarantine of the same dog can go straight to both the propensity and knowledge elements. In Thibodeaux, for example, the dog had already been quarantined after a February 2013 bite before it bit the plaintiff that April.
Breed did not decide TLM either. The guest pointed to the dog being a pit bull, and the court decided the case on what the landlord knew. The case is built on what this dog did.
Reporting a Dog Bite and the Rabies Rules in Mississippi
Mississippi does not make a dog bite a reportable condition. The state health department says in its rabies guidance that bites and exposures “are not a reportable condition in Mississippi,” while confirmed or suspected rabies is. So do not assume a doctor’s visit puts the bite on record with the state. Report the bite anyway, to the city or county animal control office or local law enforcement where it happened. Local ordinances may require it, and the report creates the dated record your claim will rely on. Here is what happens after a dog bite is reported.
The quarantine rule comes from the health department’s regulations. Under its rabies rule, a healthy dog that bites a person “shall be confined and observed for 10 days in a manner acceptable to the local health officer.” No rabies vaccine may be given during that period, any illness must be reported to the local health department, and a dog showing signs of rabies is euthanized and tested. A stray or unwanted dog that bites may be euthanized and tested right away instead.
State law also requires every dog and cat three months or older to be vaccinated against rabies under Code section 41-53-1, and the same health department rule calls for vaccination at three months, again one year later, and every three years after that. Bats are the main rabies carrier in Mississippi and rabies in land animals is exceptionally rare, according to the department’s rabies page, but the decision about rabies shots belongs to you and your doctor. If the owner cannot show a current vaccination, read about being bitten by an unvaccinated dog.
Ask for the bite report and the quarantine paperwork. They are often the first official proof of who owned the dog.
Average Dog Bite Settlement in Mississippi
We have not found a published average settlement figure for Mississippi dog bite cases. The best available benchmark is national. For 2025, the Insurance Information Institute and State Farm reported an average dog-related injury claim of $65,450 across the country, with no separate figure for Mississippi in their 2025 claims report. That average covers every claim large and small and does not predict the value of any one case.
What moves the value of a Mississippi claim:
- Strength of the propensity evidence. This is the biggest Mississippi factor. A case with a documented earlier attack and a warning to the owner is worth far more than one that depends on a single neighbor’s memory, because without that proof there may be no recovery at all.
- Severity and location of the injury. A facial scar on a child is valued differently from a bite to the calf.
- Economic losses. Medical bills and lost wages are uncapped.
- Your share of fault. Pure comparative negligence reduces the award by your share of the fault but does not bar it.
- Insurance available. A homeowners or renters policy limit often sets the practical ceiling.
- Who the defendant is. A public body is capped at $500,000 and owes no punitive damages.
For more on what drives value, see dog bite settlement amounts, and use the dog bite settlement calculator for a rough range.
Homeowner and Renter Insurance for Mississippi Dog Bites
Look first for a homeowners or renters liability policy. The Insurance Information Institute says standard homeowners and renters insurance typically covers dog bite liability up to the policy’s liability limits, usually $100,000 to $300,000, with the dog owner responsible for anything above that.
Three Mississippi points. First, check the actual policy for breed exclusions or dog limits rather than assuming there is or is not coverage. Second, if the owner’s insurer handles the claim, expect it to build its case around the dangerous propensity rule, asking what the dog did before and what the owner knew, so its first questions to you are rarely just about your injuries. Third, because renters insurance typically covers dog bite liability too, a tenant’s own policy may respond even when the landlord, after TLM, is not liable.
Do not accept the owner’s word that there is no insurance. Ask for the insurer’s name and the policy number. And before giving an adjuster a recorded statement, remember that an offhand comment about what you did near the dog can raise your share of fault, while an offhand comment from the owner about the dog’s past can be the most valuable evidence in the case.
Steps to Take Right After a Mississippi Dog Bite
- Get medical care the same day. The state health department says to wash the wound thoroughly with plenty of soap and water for several minutes and to get prompt medical attention from your doctor or an emergency room.
- Get the owner’s name, address, and phone number. The health department lists this as a first step, and it is the starting point for finding the insurer and the dog’s rabies records.
- Report the bite to local animal control or the police. Bites are not a reportable condition with the state health department, so create the record yourself. Under the state health rule, a healthy dog that bites a person must be confined and observed for ten days.
- Ask about the dog’s history right away. Has it bitten, chased, or snapped at anyone before? Has anyone complained to the owner or a landlord? Write down every answer and the name of the person who gave it.
- Find the witnesses who know the dog, not just the ones who saw your bite: neighbors, mail carriers, delivery drivers, and anyone the dog has gone after before. Under the dangerous propensity rule they may matter more.
- Photograph the wounds and the scene. Take pictures every few days as the injury heals, plus the fence, gate, chain, or broken latch.
- Keep every bill, receipt, and work absence record. Here is what counts as medical evidence in a dog bite claim.
- If a public body is involved, start the notice now. The 90 day notice and one year limit under the Tort Claims Act are far shorter than the ordinary three years.
- Do not sign a release or give a recorded statement. Early offers usually come before anyone knows whether a scar will need revision.
For the full sequence, read our guide on how to file a dog bite claim.
Why Mississippi Victims Choose Dog Bite Laws
Dog Bite Laws handles dog attack cases, and Mississippi is a state where the work is mostly investigation. With no statute to lean on, a claim rises or falls on proof of what the dog did before and who knew. We look for that proof early: animal control and police records, earlier bite reports and quarantines, complaints to landlords and property managers, and the neighbors and workers who saw the dog behave aggressively. We identify every owner and landlord who may share responsibility, and we find the insurance policy that applies.
We deal with the insurer for you, and if a city, county, or school district is involved, we track the 90 day notice and one year deadline from the start. We work on a contingency fee, so there is nothing to pay up front and no fee unless we recover money for you. Founding attorney Michael Agruss built the firm around injury clients who need someone else to carry the paperwork.
We take dog bite cases across Mississippi. If you or your child was bitten, contact us for a free consultation, and we will tell you honestly whether there is a claim worth bringing.
Các câu hỏi thường gặp
Not exactly. Mississippi has no dog bite statute, so you must prove the dog showed a dangerous propensity before the attack and that the owner knew or should have known. But the earlier conduct does not have to be a bite. The Mississippi Supreme Court has held that growling, barking, chasing, and even a playful tendency to injure people can be enough to put an owner on notice, so a first bite can still lead to a successful claim.
You may still have a claim if there is other evidence the dog was aggressive and the owner knew. Look for neighbors, delivery drivers, or mail carriers who saw it growl at, bark at, or chase people, and for complaints made to the owner or a landlord. If there is truly no sign of earlier aggression, a Mississippi claim against the owner is hard to win, which is why gathering this evidence quickly matters.
Generally three years from the date of the bite under Code section 15-1-49. A child has until three years after turning 21, because Mississippi's age of majority is 21. If a city, county, school district, or state agency is responsible, the Tort Claims Act applies instead: written notice at least 90 days before suing and a one year limit, so act quickly in those cases.
Yes. Mississippi follows pure comparative negligence, so your own fault never bars recovery by itself; it reduces the award by your percentage. A person found 30 percent at fault recovers 70 percent of the damages. You still have to prove the owner was negligent under the dangerous propensity rule before any reduction applies.
Only with knowledge. In TLM Investments v. Yates (2025) the Mississippi Supreme Court held a landlord liable only if it had actual or constructive notice of the dog's dangerous propensities, and it ruled for a landlord whose tenant hid the dog. A landlord that controls a common area and ignores complaints about an aggressive dog can be liable, but not for attacks on land it does not own or control.
There is a cap on noneconomic losses only. Pain, suffering, emotional distress, and disfigurement are limited to $1 million under Code section 11-1-60, while medical bills and lost wages are uncapped. Punitive damages require clear and convincing proof of malice or gross negligence and are limited by the defendant's net worth. Claims against a government body are capped at $500,000 for all claims from a single occurrence.
The state health department does not treat dog bites as a reportable condition, but you should still report one to local animal control or the police. State health rules require a healthy dog that bites a person to be confined and observed for ten days, and a report helps answer the rabies question and creates an official record of the dog and its owner that your claim can rely on. Some local ordinances also require reporting.
Hãy cho chúng tôi biết về trường hợp bị chó cắn của bạn
"*" là ký hiệu cho các trường bắt buộc
Các bang khác mà chúng tôi phục vụ
Lời chia sẻ từ khách hàng
Luật về vụ chó cắn đặt công lý lên hàng đầu
Hãy liên hệ với chúng tôi qua điện thoại, email, tin nhắn hoặc trò chuyện trực tuyến để trao đổi về trường hợp của bạn.
"*" là ký hiệu cho các trường bắt buộc